KNI vs PKT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KNI | PKT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.10% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.66% | 0.68% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | 3.08% | 3.25% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.54% | 10.11% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 20.14% | 21.53% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 30.91% | 32.77% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | — | 46.34% | 21.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KNI vs PKT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KNI leads in 2 and PKT leads in 6. KNI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KNI leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.68% vs 0.66%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.25% vs 3.08%). 3 months: PKT leads (10.11% vs 9.54%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.53% vs 20.14%). YTD: PKT leads (32.77% vs 30.91%). Size (TRY): KNI leads (6.6B vs 6.3B). Investors: PKT leads (1,215 vs 401).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, KNI or PKT?
Year to date KNI returned 30.91% and PKT returned 32.77%; over the last year KNI returned — and PKT returned 46.34%. Over the last month KNI returned 3.08% and PKT returned 3.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KNI or PKT?
As of September 29, 2026, KNI has a size of TRY 6.6B with 401 investors, while PKT has a size of TRY 6.3B with 1,215 investors. KNI leads in size and PKT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KNI and PKT mean?
The CMB risk score of KNI is 2 out of 7 and that of PKT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.