Yatırımcı.AI

GBN vs PKT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

GBNPKT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GBN vs PKT Fund Comparison
MetricGBNPKTCategory median
Daily0.09%0.10%0.07%
1 week0.66%0.68%0.51%
1 month2.98%3.05%1.66%
3 months9.34%9.65%3.04%
6 months20.35%21.12%8.17%
YTD37.61%38.79%17.49%
1 year44.44%45.84%21.23%
3 years255.62%—105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GBN vs PKT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GBN leads in 0 and PKT leads in 9. GBN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.10% vs 0.09%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.68% vs 0.66%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.05% vs 2.98%). 3 months: PKT leads (9.65% vs 9.34%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.12% vs 20.35%). YTD: PKT leads (38.79% vs 37.61%). 1 year: PKT leads (45.84% vs 44.44%). Size (TRY): PKT leads (6.9B vs 6.7B). Investors: PKT leads (1,418 vs 371).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GBN returned 37.61% and PKT returned 38.79%; over the last year GBN returned 44.44% and PKT returned 45.84%. Over the last month GBN returned 2.98% and PKT returned 3.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, GBN has a size of TRY 6.7B with 371 investors, while PKT has a size of TRY 6.9B with 1,418 investors. PKT leads in size and PKT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GBN is 2 out of 7 and that of PKT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.