Yatırımcı.AI

GBN vs KNI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

GBNKNI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GBN vs KNI Fund Comparison
MetricGBNKNICategory median
Daily0.29%0.27%0.19%
1 week0.68%0.65%0.42%
1 month3.07%2.98%0.94%
3 months9.67%9.43%5.89%
6 months21.04%20.38%12.86%
YTD31.46%30.52%18.07%
1 year44.87%—24.44%
3 years256.30%—111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GBN vs KNI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GBN leads in 6 and KNI leads in 2. GBN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KNI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GBN leads (0.29% vs 0.27%). 1 week: GBN leads (0.68% vs 0.65%). 1 month: GBN leads (3.07% vs 2.98%). 3 months: GBN leads (9.67% vs 9.43%). 6 months: GBN leads (21.04% vs 20.38%). YTD: GBN leads (31.46% vs 30.52%). Size (TRY): KNI leads (6.6B vs 6.4B). Investors: KNI leads (403 vs 378).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GBN returned 31.46% and KNI returned 30.52%; over the last year GBN returned 44.87% and KNI returned —. Over the last month GBN returned 3.07% and KNI returned 2.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GBN has a size of TRY 6.4B with 378 investors, while KNI has a size of TRY 6.6B with 403 investors. KNI leads in size and KNI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GBN is 2 out of 7 and that of KNI is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.