Yatırımcı.AI

FSR vs PKT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

FSRPKT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FSR vs PKT Fund Comparison
MetricFSRPKTCategory median
Daily0.08%0.10%−0.07%
1 week−0.47%0.68%−0.29%
1 month−0.34%3.25%0.00%
3 months5.81%10.11%4.33%
6 months10.36%21.53%11.90%
YTD12.12%32.77%14.97%
1 year17.44%46.34%21.27%
3 years17.30%—111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FSR vs PKT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FSR leads in 1 and PKT leads in 8. FSR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.10% vs 0.08%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.68% vs −0.47%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.25% vs −0.34%). 3 months: PKT leads (10.11% vs 5.81%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.53% vs 10.36%). YTD: PKT leads (32.77% vs 12.12%). 1 year: PKT leads (46.34% vs 17.44%). Size (TRY): PKT leads (6.3B vs 6.3B). Investors: FSR leads (2,378 vs 1,215).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FSR returned 12.12% and PKT returned 32.77%; over the last year FSR returned 17.44% and PKT returned 46.34%. Over the last month FSR returned −0.34% and PKT returned 3.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FSR has a size of TRY 6.3B with 2,378 investors, while PKT has a size of TRY 6.3B with 1,215 investors. PKT leads in size and FSR leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSR is — out of 7 and that of PKT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.