GPC vs KNI Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GPC | KNI | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.20% | 0.27% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.22% | 0.65% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −0.29% | 2.98% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 3.75% | 9.43% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 12.29% | 20.38% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 13.53% | 30.52% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 20.58% | — | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 128.74% | — | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GPC vs KNI Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GPC leads in 2 and KNI leads in 7. GPC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KNI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KNI leads (0.27% vs −0.20%). 1 week: KNI leads (0.65% vs −0.22%). 1 month: KNI leads (2.98% vs −0.29%). 3 months: KNI leads (9.43% vs 3.75%). 6 months: KNI leads (20.38% vs 12.29%). YTD: KNI leads (30.52% vs 13.53%). Size (TRY): KNI leads (6.6B vs 6.5B). Investors: GPC leads (3,390 vs 403). Risk: GPC leads (0 vs 2).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GPC or KNI?
Year to date GPC returned 13.53% and KNI returned 30.52%; over the last year GPC returned 20.58% and KNI returned —. Over the last month GPC returned −0.29% and KNI returned 2.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GPC or KNI?
As of September 28, 2026, GPC has a size of TRY 6.5B with 3,390 investors, while KNI has a size of TRY 6.6B with 403 investors. KNI leads in size and GPC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GPC and KNI mean?
The CMB risk score of GPC is 0 out of 7 and that of KNI is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.