Yatırımcı.AI

GPC vs PKT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

GPCPKT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPC vs PKT Fund Comparison
MetricGPCPKTCategory median
Daily−0.37%0.10%−0.07%
1 week−0.94%0.68%−0.29%
1 month−0.65%3.25%0.00%
3 months3.37%10.11%4.33%
6 months12.71%21.53%11.90%
YTD13.09%32.77%14.97%
1 year20.14%46.34%21.27%
3 years129.80%—111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPC vs PKT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPC (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GPC leads in 2 and PKT leads in 7. GPC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.10% vs −0.37%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.68% vs −0.94%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.25% vs −0.65%). 3 months: PKT leads (10.11% vs 3.37%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.53% vs 12.71%). YTD: PKT leads (32.77% vs 13.09%). 1 year: PKT leads (46.34% vs 20.14%). Size (TRY): GPC leads (6.4B vs 6.3B). Investors: GPC leads (3,380 vs 1,215).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPC returned 13.09% and PKT returned 32.77%; over the last year GPC returned 20.14% and PKT returned 46.34%. Over the last month GPC returned −0.65% and PKT returned 3.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GPC has a size of TRY 6.4B with 3,380 investors, while PKT has a size of TRY 6.3B with 1,215 investors. GPC leads in size and GPC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPC is — out of 7 and that of PKT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.