UNT vs ZPA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | UNT | ZPA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.09% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.66% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 3.01% | 2.28% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 9.43% | 6.51% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 20.64% | 12.97% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 38.27% | 20.71% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 45.36% | 23.95% | 21.23% |
| 3 years | — | 110.14% | 105.57% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the UNT vs ZPA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, UNT leads in 9 and ZPA leads in 1. UNT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: UNT leads (0.09% vs 0.07%). 1 week: UNT leads (0.66% vs 0.51%). 1 month: UNT leads (3.01% vs 2.28%). 3 months: UNT leads (9.43% vs 6.51%). 6 months: UNT leads (20.64% vs 12.97%). YTD: UNT leads (38.27% vs 20.71%). 1 year: UNT leads (45.36% vs 23.95%). Size (TRY): UNT leads (5.3B vs 5.1B). Investors: ZPA leads (985 vs 277). Risk: UNT leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, UNT or ZPA?
Year to date UNT returned 38.27% and ZPA returned 20.71%; over the last year UNT returned 45.36% and ZPA returned 23.95%. Over the last month UNT returned 3.01% and ZPA returned 2.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, UNT or ZPA?
As of November 13, 2026, UNT has a size of TRY 5.3B with 277 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 5.1B with 985 investors. UNT leads in size and ZPA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of UNT and ZPA mean?
The CMB risk score of UNT is 2 out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.