Yatırımcı.AI

PIP vs ZPA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PIP (Garanti Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

PIPZPA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PIP vs ZPA Fund Comparison
MetricPIPZPACategory median
Daily0.10%0.06%0.05%
1 week0.69%0.51%0.44%
1 month2.99%2.03%0.38%
3 months9.78%6.33%3.95%
6 months21.00%12.44%8.45%
YTD35.76%18.79%16.06%
1 year45.98%23.35%20.98%
3 years—114.02%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PIP vs ZPA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PIP (Garanti Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PIP leads in 8 and ZPA leads in 2. PIP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PIP leads (0.10% vs 0.06%). 1 week: PIP leads (0.69% vs 0.51%). 1 month: PIP leads (2.99% vs 2.03%). 3 months: PIP leads (9.78% vs 6.33%). 6 months: PIP leads (21.00% vs 12.44%). YTD: PIP leads (35.76% vs 18.79%). 1 year: PIP leads (45.98% vs 23.35%). Size (TRY): ZPA leads (5.1B vs 5B). Investors: ZPA leads (999 vs 389). Risk: PIP leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PIP returned 35.76% and ZPA returned 18.79%; over the last year PIP returned 45.98% and ZPA returned 23.35%. Over the last month PIP returned 2.99% and ZPA returned 2.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, PIP has a size of TRY 5B with 389 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 5.1B with 999 investors. ZPA leads in size and ZPA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PIP is 2 out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.