Yatırımcı.AI

EUN vs ZPA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EUN (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

EUNZPA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EUN vs ZPA Fund Comparison
MetricEUNZPACategory median
Daily0.24%0.06%0.05%
1 week0.86%0.51%0.44%
1 month−0.07%2.03%0.38%
3 months3.34%6.33%3.95%
6 months6.47%12.44%8.45%
YTD11.87%18.79%16.06%
1 year17.83%23.35%20.98%
3 years32.16%114.02%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EUN vs ZPA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EUN (Garanti Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EUN leads in 4 and ZPA leads in 6. EUN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EUN leads (0.24% vs 0.06%). 1 week: EUN leads (0.86% vs 0.51%). 1 month: ZPA leads (2.03% vs −0.07%). 3 months: ZPA leads (6.33% vs 3.34%). 6 months: ZPA leads (12.44% vs 6.47%). YTD: ZPA leads (18.79% vs 11.87%). 1 year: ZPA leads (23.35% vs 17.83%). 3 years: ZPA leads (114.02% vs 32.16%). Size (TRY): EUN leads (5.3B vs 5.1B). Investors: EUN leads (3,126 vs 999).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EUN returned 11.87% and ZPA returned 18.79%; over the last year EUN returned 17.83% and ZPA returned 23.35%. Over the last month EUN returned −0.07% and ZPA returned 2.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, EUN has a size of TRY 5.3B with 3,126 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 5.1B with 999 investors. EUN leads in size and EUN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EUN is — out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.