CKS vs UNT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CKS | UNT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 2.66% | 3.01% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 5.34% | 9.43% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 11.51% | 20.64% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 19.56% | 38.27% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 22.95% | 45.36% | 21.23% |
| 3 years | 113.34% | — | 105.57% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CKS vs UNT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, CKS leads in 1 and UNT leads in 8. CKS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UNT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: UNT leads (0.09% vs 0.04%). 1 week: UNT leads (0.66% vs 0.56%). 1 month: UNT leads (3.01% vs 2.66%). 3 months: UNT leads (9.43% vs 5.34%). 6 months: UNT leads (20.64% vs 11.51%). YTD: UNT leads (38.27% vs 19.56%). 1 year: UNT leads (45.36% vs 22.95%). Size (TRY): UNT leads (5.3B vs 5B). Investors: CKS leads (2,081 vs 277).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CKS or UNT?
Year to date CKS returned 19.56% and UNT returned 38.27%; over the last year CKS returned 22.95% and UNT returned 45.36%. Over the last month CKS returned 2.66% and UNT returned 3.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CKS or UNT?
As of November 13, 2026, CKS has a size of TRY 5B with 2,081 investors, while UNT has a size of TRY 5.3B with 277 investors. UNT leads in size and CKS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CKS and UNT mean?
The CMB risk score of CKS is — out of 7 and that of UNT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.