Yatırımcı.AI

CKS vs ZPA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

CKSZPA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CKS vs ZPA Fund Comparison
MetricCKSZPACategory median
Daily0.08%0.06%0.05%
1 week0.52%0.51%0.44%
1 month1.46%2.03%0.38%
3 months4.96%6.33%3.95%
6 months10.53%12.44%8.45%
YTD17.46%18.79%16.06%
1 year22.01%23.35%20.98%
3 years115.87%114.02%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CKS vs ZPA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CKS leads in 4 and ZPA leads in 6. CKS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CKS leads (0.08% vs 0.06%). 1 week: CKS leads (0.52% vs 0.51%). 1 month: ZPA leads (2.03% vs 1.46%). 3 months: ZPA leads (6.33% vs 4.96%). 6 months: ZPA leads (12.44% vs 10.53%). YTD: ZPA leads (18.79% vs 17.46%). 1 year: ZPA leads (23.35% vs 22.01%). 3 years: CKS leads (115.87% vs 114.02%). Size (TRY): ZPA leads (5.1B vs 5.1B). Investors: CKS leads (2,129 vs 999).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CKS returned 17.46% and ZPA returned 18.79%; over the last year CKS returned 22.01% and ZPA returned 23.35%. Over the last month CKS returned 1.46% and ZPA returned 2.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, CKS has a size of TRY 5.1B with 2,129 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 5.1B with 999 investors. ZPA leads in size and CKS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CKS is — out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.