Yatırımcı.AI

RKS vs RRP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) and RRP (Re-Pie Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fon) side by side.

RKSRRP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RKS vs RRP Fund Comparison
MetricRKSRRPCategory median
Daily0.09%0.11%−0.60%
1 week0.67%0.55%−0.86%
1 month2.91%2.78%−0.33%
3 months4.91%9.28%4.42%
6 months14.95%20.28%12.01%
YTD27.98%34.16%28.30%
1 year37.27%43.73%34.68%
3 years18.82%—158.22%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RKS vs RRP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) and RRP (Re-Pie Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, RKS leads in 4 and RRP leads in 5. RKS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RRP is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RRP leads (0.11% vs 0.09%). 1 week: RKS leads (0.67% vs 0.55%). 1 month: RKS leads (2.91% vs 2.78%). 3 months: RRP leads (9.28% vs 4.91%). 6 months: RRP leads (20.28% vs 14.95%). YTD: RRP leads (34.16% vs 27.98%). 1 year: RRP leads (43.73% vs 37.27%). Size (TRY): RKS leads (93.6M vs 457.9K). Investors: RKS leads (126 vs 64).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RKS returned 27.98% and RRP returned 34.16%; over the last year RKS returned 37.27% and RRP returned 43.73%. Over the last month RKS returned 2.91% and RRP returned 2.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, RKS has a size of TRY 93.6M with 126 investors, while RRP has a size of TRY 457.9K with 64 investors. RKS leads in size and RKS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RKS is 2 out of 7 and that of RRP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.