Yatırımcı.AI

KUA vs RKS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KUA (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Agresif Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) side by side.

KUARKS
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KUA vs RKS Fund Comparison
MetricKUARKSCategory median
Today (est.)−1.97%—−2.37%
Daily0.56%0.28%0.29%
1 week0.47%0.68%0.41%
1 month−4.38%3.06%0.20%
3 months−2.83%5.00%8.83%
6 months9.91%15.15%16.56%
YTD18.08%24.81%27.81%
1 year21.66%37.49%39.52%
3 years—18.82%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 12:05.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KUA vs RKS comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KUA (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Agresif Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KUA leads in 2 and RKS leads in 8. KUA is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KUA leads (0.56% vs 0.28%). 1 week: RKS leads (0.68% vs 0.47%). 1 month: RKS leads (3.06% vs −4.38%). 3 months: RKS leads (5.00% vs −2.83%). 6 months: RKS leads (15.15% vs 9.91%). YTD: RKS leads (24.81% vs 18.08%). 1 year: RKS leads (37.49% vs 21.66%). Size (TRY): RKS leads (94.6M vs 89.9M). Investors: KUA leads (1,961 vs 129). Risk: RKS leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KUA returned 18.08% and RKS returned 24.81%; over the last year KUA returned 21.66% and RKS returned 37.49%. Over the last month KUA returned −4.38% and RKS returned 3.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KUA has a size of TRY 89.9M with 1,961 investors, while RKS has a size of TRY 94.6M with 129 investors. RKS leads in size and KUA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KUA is 5 out of 7 and that of RKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.