Yatırımcı.AI

KME vs RKS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KME (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Temkinli Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) side by side.

KMERKS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KME vs RKS Fund Comparison
MetricKMERKSCategory median
Daily−0.09%0.09%−0.60%
1 week0.00%0.67%−0.86%
1 month1.40%2.91%−0.33%
3 months4.45%4.91%4.42%
6 months12.06%14.95%12.01%
YTD29.42%27.98%28.30%
1 year38.07%37.27%34.68%
3 years—18.82%158.22%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KME vs RKS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KME (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Temkinli Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KME leads in 4 and RKS leads in 5. KME is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RKS leads (0.09% vs −0.09%). 1 week: RKS leads (0.67% vs 0.00%). 1 month: RKS leads (2.91% vs 1.40%). 3 months: RKS leads (4.91% vs 4.45%). 6 months: RKS leads (14.95% vs 12.06%). YTD: KME leads (29.42% vs 27.98%). 1 year: KME leads (38.07% vs 37.27%). Size (TRY): KME leads (93.6M vs 93.6M). Investors: KME leads (1,097 vs 126).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KME returned 29.42% and RKS returned 27.98%; over the last year KME returned 38.07% and RKS returned 37.27%. Over the last month KME returned 1.40% and RKS returned 2.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, KME has a size of TRY 93.6M with 1,097 investors, while RKS has a size of TRY 93.6M with 126 investors. KME leads in size and KME leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KME is 2 out of 7 and that of RKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.