Yatırımcı.AI

FAK vs RRP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FAK (Fonmap Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and RRP (Re-Pie Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fon) side by side.

FAKRRP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FAK vs RRP Fund Comparison
MetricFAKRRPCategory median
Today (est.)−0.35%—−1.43%
Daily−1.15%0.11%−0.60%
1 week−1.32%0.55%−0.86%
1 month−4.63%2.78%−0.33%
3 months0.57%9.28%4.42%
6 months−11.66%20.28%12.01%
YTD−18.00%34.16%28.30%
1 year0.00%43.73%34.68%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 23, 2026, 17:36.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FAK vs RRP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FAK (Fonmap Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and RRP (Re-Pie Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FAK leads in 2 and RRP leads in 8. FAK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneva Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RRP is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RRP leads (0.11% vs −1.15%). 1 week: RRP leads (0.55% vs −1.32%). 1 month: RRP leads (2.78% vs −4.63%). 3 months: RRP leads (9.28% vs 0.57%). 6 months: RRP leads (20.28% vs −11.66%). YTD: RRP leads (34.16% vs −18.00%). 1 year: RRP leads (43.73% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): FAK leads (10.2M vs 457.9K). Investors: FAK leads (264 vs 64). Risk: RRP leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FAK returned −18.00% and RRP returned 34.16%; over the last year FAK returned 0.00% and RRP returned 43.73%. Over the last month FAK returned −4.63% and RRP returned 2.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FAK has a size of TRY 10.2M with 264 investors, while RRP has a size of TRY 457.9K with 64 investors. FAK leads in size and FAK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FAK is 6 out of 7 and that of RRP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.