Yatırımcı.AI

FBC vs RKS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBC (One Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) side by side.

FBCRKS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBC vs RKS Fund Comparison
MetricFBCRKSCategory median
Today (est.)−0.76%—−1.03%
Daily−2.02%0.09%−0.60%
1 week−6.71%0.67%−0.86%
1 month−18.30%2.91%−0.33%
3 months−32.59%4.91%4.42%
6 months−36.03%14.95%12.01%
YTD−25.37%27.98%28.30%
1 year−21.62%37.27%34.68%
3 years19.12%18.82%158.22%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 23, 2026, 22:47.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBC vs RKS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBC (One Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FBC leads in 3 and RKS leads in 8. FBC is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RKS leads (0.09% vs −2.02%). 1 week: RKS leads (0.67% vs −6.71%). 1 month: RKS leads (2.91% vs −18.30%). 3 months: RKS leads (4.91% vs −32.59%). 6 months: RKS leads (14.95% vs −36.03%). YTD: RKS leads (27.98% vs −25.37%). 1 year: RKS leads (37.27% vs −21.62%). 3 years: FBC leads (19.12% vs 18.82%). Size (TRY): FBC leads (103.1M vs 93.6M). Investors: FBC leads (5,012 vs 126). Risk: RKS leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBC returned −25.37% and RKS returned 27.98%; over the last year FBC returned −21.62% and RKS returned 37.27%. Over the last month FBC returned −18.30% and RKS returned 2.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FBC has a size of TRY 103.1M with 5,012 investors, while RKS has a size of TRY 93.6M with 126 investors. FBC leads in size and FBC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBC is 6 out of 7 and that of RKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.