Yatırımcı.AI

PPS vs RPX Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and RPX (Rota Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

PPSRPX
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PPS vs RPX Fund Comparison
MetricPPSRPXCategory median
Daily3.48%0.05%0.01%
1 week4.80%0.39%0.30%
1 month18.64%1.41%0.00%
3 months18.13%5.28%3.96%
6 months−1.41%11.38%8.18%
YTD8.84%17.93%15.73%
1 year16.16%21.59%20.69%
3 years209.57%101.80%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PPS vs RPX Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and RPX (Rota Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PPS leads in 7 and RPX leads in 3. PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPX is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPS leads (3.48% vs 0.05%). 1 week: PPS leads (4.80% vs 0.39%). 1 month: PPS leads (18.64% vs 1.41%). 3 months: PPS leads (18.13% vs 5.28%). 6 months: RPX leads (11.38% vs −1.41%). YTD: RPX leads (17.93% vs 8.84%). 1 year: RPX leads (21.59% vs 16.16%). 3 years: PPS leads (209.57% vs 101.80%). Size (TRY): PPS leads (570.5M vs 538M). Investors: PPS leads (1,472 vs 82).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PPS returned 8.84% and RPX returned 17.93%; over the last year PPS returned 16.16% and RPX returned 21.59%. Over the last month PPS returned 18.64% and RPX returned 1.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, PPS has a size of TRY 570.5M with 1,472 investors, while RPX has a size of TRY 538M with 82 investors. PPS leads in size and PPS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PPS is 7 out of 7 and that of RPX is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.