BSM vs PPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BSM (Global MD Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BSM | PPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.11% | 3.48% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.32% | 4.80% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 3.16% | 18.64% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 12.90% | 18.13% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 31.36% | −1.41% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 65.60% | 8.84% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | — | 16.16% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | — | 209.57% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BSM vs PPS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BSM (Global MD Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, BSM leads in 3 and PPS leads in 5. BSM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PPS leads (3.48% vs −0.11%). 1 week: PPS leads (4.80% vs 0.32%). 1 month: PPS leads (18.64% vs 3.16%). 3 months: PPS leads (18.13% vs 12.90%). 6 months: BSM leads (31.36% vs −1.41%). YTD: BSM leads (65.60% vs 8.84%). Size (TRY): BSM leads (571.5M vs 570.5M). Investors: PPS leads (1,472 vs 1,367).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BSM or PPS?
Year to date BSM returned 65.60% and PPS returned 8.84%; over the last year BSM returned — and PPS returned 16.16%. Over the last month BSM returned 3.16% and PPS returned 18.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BSM or PPS?
As of October 23, 2026, BSM has a size of TRY 571.5M with 1,367 investors, while PPS has a size of TRY 570.5M with 1,472 investors. BSM leads in size and PPS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BSM and PPS mean?
The CMB risk score of BSM is 7 out of 7 and that of PPS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.