GMI vs PPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GMI | PPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.43% | −3.18% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | −5.72% | 6.86% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −12.42% | 8.00% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 0.25% | 13.83% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | −22.57% | −4.73% | 8.45% |
| YTD | −16.66% | 5.18% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | — | 10.28% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | — | 199.15% | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GMI vs PPS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GMI leads in 3 and PPS leads in 5. GMI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GMI leads (0.43% vs −3.18%). 1 week: PPS leads (6.86% vs −5.72%). 1 month: PPS leads (8.00% vs −12.42%). 3 months: PPS leads (13.83% vs 0.25%). 6 months: PPS leads (−4.73% vs −22.57%). YTD: PPS leads (5.18% vs −16.66%). Size (TRY): GMI leads (557.1M vs 553.3M). Investors: GMI leads (4,695 vs 1,482).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GMI or PPS?
Year to date GMI returned −16.66% and PPS returned 5.18%; over the last year GMI returned — and PPS returned 10.28%. Over the last month GMI returned −12.42% and PPS returned 8.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GMI or PPS?
As of October 22, 2026, GMI has a size of TRY 557.1M with 4,695 investors, while PPS has a size of TRY 553.3M with 1,482 investors. GMI leads in size and GMI leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GMI and PPS mean?
The CMB risk score of GMI is 7 out of 7 and that of PPS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.