Yatırımcı.AI

FBV vs RPX Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and RPX (Rota Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FBVRPX
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBV vs RPX Fund Comparison
MetricFBVRPXCategory median
Daily−2.63%0.05%0.01%
1 week−2.76%0.39%0.30%
1 month−9.72%1.41%0.00%
3 months−4.90%5.28%3.96%
6 months−3.69%11.38%8.18%
YTD14.11%17.93%15.73%
1 year21.04%21.59%20.69%
3 years197.90%101.80%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBV vs RPX Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and RPX (Rota Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FBV leads in 3 and RPX leads in 7. FBV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPX is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RPX leads (0.05% vs −2.63%). 1 week: RPX leads (0.39% vs −2.76%). 1 month: RPX leads (1.41% vs −9.72%). 3 months: RPX leads (5.28% vs −4.90%). 6 months: RPX leads (11.38% vs −3.69%). YTD: RPX leads (17.93% vs 14.11%). 1 year: RPX leads (21.59% vs 21.04%). 3 years: FBV leads (197.90% vs 101.80%). Size (TRY): FBV leads (538.9M vs 538M). Investors: FBV leads (1,614 vs 82).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBV returned 14.11% and RPX returned 17.93%; over the last year FBV returned 21.04% and RPX returned 21.59%. Over the last month FBV returned −9.72% and RPX returned 1.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FBV has a size of TRY 538.9M with 1,614 investors, while RPX has a size of TRY 538M with 82 investors. FBV leads in size and FBV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBV is 6 out of 7 and that of RPX is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.