Yatırımcı.AI

HYP vs PPS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HYP (Azimut Portföy İvme Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

HYPPPS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

HYP vs PPS Fund Comparison
MetricHYPPPSCategory median
Daily0.09%3.48%0.01%
1 week0.68%4.80%0.30%
1 month3.00%18.64%0.00%
3 months10.06%18.13%3.96%
6 months25.50%−1.41%8.18%
YTD38.76%8.84%15.73%
1 year44.78%16.16%20.69%
3 years190.86%209.57%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the HYP vs PPS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HYP (Azimut Portföy İvme Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, HYP leads in 5 and PPS leads in 6. HYP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPS leads (3.48% vs 0.09%). 1 week: PPS leads (4.80% vs 0.68%). 1 month: PPS leads (18.64% vs 3.00%). 3 months: PPS leads (18.13% vs 10.06%). 6 months: HYP leads (25.50% vs −1.41%). YTD: HYP leads (38.76% vs 8.84%). 1 year: HYP leads (44.78% vs 16.16%). 3 years: PPS leads (209.57% vs 190.86%). Size (TRY): HYP leads (596.3M vs 570.5M). Investors: PPS leads (1,472 vs 58). Risk: HYP leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date HYP returned 38.76% and PPS returned 8.84%; over the last year HYP returned 44.78% and PPS returned 16.16%. Over the last month HYP returned 3.00% and PPS returned 18.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, HYP has a size of TRY 596.3M with 58 investors, while PPS has a size of TRY 570.5M with 1,472 investors. HYP leads in size and PPS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HYP is 6 out of 7 and that of PPS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.