NAK vs RKS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NAK (Neo Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | NAK | RKS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.24% | 0.08% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | −2.76% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
| 1 month | −3.53% | 2.77% | −0.35% |
| 3 months | −5.28% | 8.75% | 0.36% |
| 6 months | −7.17% | 14.64% | 6.63% |
| YTD | 0.36% | 30.28% | 29.48% |
| 1 year | — | 36.76% | 34.71% |
| 3 years | — | 18.82% | 172.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the NAK vs RKS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NAK (Neo Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, NAK leads in 2 and RKS leads in 7. NAK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RKS leads (0.08% vs −2.24%). 1 week: RKS leads (0.51% vs −2.76%). 1 month: RKS leads (2.77% vs −3.53%). 3 months: RKS leads (8.75% vs −5.28%). 6 months: RKS leads (14.64% vs −7.17%). YTD: RKS leads (30.28% vs 0.36%). Size (TRY): NAK leads (112M vs 94.3M). Investors: NAK leads (125 vs 122). Risk: RKS leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, NAK or RKS?
Year to date NAK returned 0.36% and RKS returned 30.28%; over the last year NAK returned — and RKS returned 36.76%. Over the last month NAK returned −3.53% and RKS returned 2.77%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NAK or RKS?
As of November 13, 2026, NAK has a size of TRY 112M with 125 investors, while RKS has a size of TRY 94.3M with 122 investors. NAK leads in size and NAK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NAK and RKS mean?
The CMB risk score of NAK is 6 out of 7 and that of RKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.