CVK vs NAK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CVK (Inveo Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and NAK (Neo Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CVK | NAK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.04% | −2.24% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | 0.76% | −2.76% | 0.63% |
| 1 month | 2.51% | −3.53% | −0.35% |
| 3 months | 9.08% | −5.28% | 0.36% |
| 6 months | 15.71% | −7.17% | 6.63% |
| YTD | 35.26% | 0.36% | 29.48% |
| 1 year | 40.25% | — | 34.71% |
| 3 years | 194.45% | — | 172.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CVK vs NAK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CVK (Inveo Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and NAK (Neo Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, CVK leads in 8 and NAK leads in 1. CVK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NAK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CVK leads (0.04% vs −2.24%). 1 week: CVK leads (0.76% vs −2.76%). 1 month: CVK leads (2.51% vs −3.53%). 3 months: CVK leads (9.08% vs −5.28%). 6 months: CVK leads (15.71% vs −7.17%). YTD: CVK leads (35.26% vs 0.36%). Size (TRY): NAK leads (112M vs 111.7M). Investors: CVK leads (1,542 vs 125). Risk: CVK leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CVK or NAK?
Year to date CVK returned 35.26% and NAK returned 0.36%; over the last year CVK returned 40.25% and NAK returned —. Over the last month CVK returned 2.51% and NAK returned −3.53%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CVK or NAK?
As of November 13, 2026, CVK has a size of TRY 111.7M with 1,542 investors, while NAK has a size of TRY 112M with 125 investors. NAK leads in size and CVK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CVK and NAK mean?
The CMB risk score of CVK is 3 out of 7 and that of NAK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.