Yatırımcı.AI

FTL vs RKS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) side by side.

FTLRKS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FTL vs RKS Fund Comparison
MetricFTLRKSCategory median
Daily0.09%0.08%0.09%
1 week0.63%0.51%0.63%
1 month2.93%2.77%−0.35%
3 months9.39%8.75%0.36%
6 months20.59%14.64%6.63%
YTD37.91%30.28%29.48%
1 year44.77%36.76%34.71%
3 years—18.82%172.21%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FTL vs RKS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FTL leads in 10 and RKS leads in 0. FTL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FTL leads (0.09% vs 0.08%). 1 week: FTL leads (0.63% vs 0.51%). 1 month: FTL leads (2.93% vs 2.77%). 3 months: FTL leads (9.39% vs 8.75%). 6 months: FTL leads (20.59% vs 14.64%). YTD: FTL leads (37.91% vs 30.28%). 1 year: FTL leads (44.77% vs 36.76%). Size (TRY): FTL leads (98M vs 94.3M). Investors: FTL leads (562 vs 122). Risk: FTL leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FTL returned 37.91% and RKS returned 30.28%; over the last year FTL returned 44.77% and RKS returned 36.76%. Over the last month FTL returned 2.93% and RKS returned 2.77%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, FTL has a size of TRY 98M with 562 investors, while RKS has a size of TRY 94.3M with 122 investors. FTL leads in size and FTL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FTL is 1 out of 7 and that of RKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.