Yatırımcı.AI

GPF vs KZU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPF (Garanti Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KZU (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.

GPFKZU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPF vs KZU Fund Comparison
MetricGPFKZUCategory median
Daily−0.82%−3.12%−0.26%
1 week−0.79%−4.01%0.07%
1 month−2.92%−8.24%0.00%
3 months4.88%6.54%7.62%
6 months13.51%0.27%16.55%
YTD22.39%1.01%28.23%
1 year34.21%21.19%39.45%
3 years169.86%27.40%164.81%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPF vs KZU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPF (Garanti Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KZU (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GPF leads in 9 and KZU leads in 2. GPF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KZU is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPF leads (−0.82% vs −3.12%). 1 week: GPF leads (−0.79% vs −4.01%). 1 month: GPF leads (−2.92% vs −8.24%). 3 months: KZU leads (6.54% vs 4.88%). 6 months: GPF leads (13.51% vs 0.27%). YTD: GPF leads (22.39% vs 1.01%). 1 year: GPF leads (34.21% vs 21.19%). 3 years: GPF leads (169.86% vs 27.40%). Size (TRY): GPF leads (521.5M vs 426.7M). Investors: KZU leads (5,568 vs 2,868). Risk: GPF leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPF returned 22.39% and KZU returned 1.01%; over the last year GPF returned 34.21% and KZU returned 21.19%. Over the last month GPF returned −2.92% and KZU returned −8.24%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GPF has a size of TRY 521.5M with 2,868 investors, while KZU has a size of TRY 426.7M with 5,568 investors. GPF leads in size and KZU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPF is 3 out of 7 and that of KZU is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.