EPA vs GPF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPA (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and GPF (Garanti Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EPA | GPF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | −0.82% | −0.26% |
| 1 week | 0.68% | −0.79% | 0.07% |
| 1 month | 3.26% | −2.92% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 10.00% | 4.88% | 7.62% |
| 6 months | 21.12% | 13.51% | 16.55% |
| YTD | 32.16% | 22.39% | 28.23% |
| 1 year | — | 34.21% | 39.45% |
| 3 years | — | 169.86% | 164.81% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EPA vs GPF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EPA (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and GPF (Garanti Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EPA leads in 8 and GPF leads in 1. EPA is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GPF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EPA leads (0.10% vs −0.82%). 1 week: EPA leads (0.68% vs −0.79%). 1 month: EPA leads (3.26% vs −2.92%). 3 months: EPA leads (10.00% vs 4.88%). 6 months: EPA leads (21.12% vs 13.51%). YTD: EPA leads (32.16% vs 22.39%). Size (TRY): EPA leads (643.7M vs 521.5M). Investors: GPF leads (2,868 vs 136). Risk: EPA leads (1 vs 3).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EPA or GPF?
Year to date EPA returned 32.16% and GPF returned 22.39%; over the last year EPA returned — and GPF returned 34.21%. Over the last month EPA returned 3.26% and GPF returned −2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EPA or GPF?
As of September 29, 2026, EPA has a size of TRY 643.7M with 136 investors, while GPF has a size of TRY 521.5M with 2,868 investors. EPA leads in size and GPF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EPA and GPF mean?
The CMB risk score of EPA is 1 out of 7 and that of GPF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.