Yatırımcı.AI

KTN vs KZU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KTN (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KZU (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.

KTNKZU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KTN vs KZU Fund Comparison
MetricKTNKZUCategory median
Daily0.14%−3.12%−0.26%
1 week−1.30%−4.01%0.07%
1 month0.41%−8.24%0.00%
3 months4.25%6.54%7.62%
6 months12.68%0.27%16.55%
YTD22.87%1.01%28.23%
1 year33.86%21.19%39.45%
3 years159.76%27.40%164.81%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KTN vs KZU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KTN (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KZU (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, KTN leads in 8 and KZU leads in 3. KTN is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KZU is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KTN leads (0.14% vs −3.12%). 1 week: KTN leads (−1.30% vs −4.01%). 1 month: KTN leads (0.41% vs −8.24%). 3 months: KZU leads (6.54% vs 4.25%). 6 months: KTN leads (12.68% vs 0.27%). YTD: KTN leads (22.87% vs 1.01%). 1 year: KTN leads (33.86% vs 21.19%). 3 years: KTN leads (159.76% vs 27.40%). Size (TRY): KZU leads (426.7M vs 386.8M). Investors: KZU leads (5,568 vs 4,202). Risk: KTN leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KTN returned 22.87% and KZU returned 1.01%; over the last year KTN returned 33.86% and KZU returned 21.19%. Over the last month KTN returned 0.41% and KZU returned −8.24%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, KTN has a size of TRY 386.8M with 4,202 investors, while KZU has a size of TRY 426.7M with 5,568 investors. KZU leads in size and KZU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KTN is 2 out of 7 and that of KZU is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.