Yatırımcı.AI

GPF vs KDE Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPF (Garanti Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KDE (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dengeli Katılım Fonu) side by side.

GPFKDE
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPF vs KDE Fund Comparison
MetricGPFKDECategory median
Daily−0.82%−0.37%−0.26%
1 week−0.79%−0.33%0.07%
1 month−2.92%−0.08%0.00%
3 months4.88%7.53%7.62%
6 months13.51%21.26%16.55%
YTD22.39%42.38%28.23%
1 year34.21%52.28%39.45%
3 years169.86%—164.81%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPF vs KDE Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPF (Garanti Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KDE (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dengeli Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GPF leads in 0 and KDE leads in 9. GPF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KDE is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KDE leads (−0.37% vs −0.82%). 1 week: KDE leads (−0.33% vs −0.79%). 1 month: KDE leads (−0.08% vs −2.92%). 3 months: KDE leads (7.53% vs 4.88%). 6 months: KDE leads (21.26% vs 13.51%). YTD: KDE leads (42.38% vs 22.39%). 1 year: KDE leads (52.28% vs 34.21%). Size (TRY): KDE leads (627.2M vs 521.5M). Investors: KDE leads (3,730 vs 2,868).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPF returned 22.39% and KDE returned 42.38%; over the last year GPF returned 34.21% and KDE returned 52.28%. Over the last month GPF returned −2.92% and KDE returned −0.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GPF has a size of TRY 521.5M with 2,868 investors, while KDE has a size of TRY 627.2M with 3,730 investors. KDE leads in size and KDE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPF is 3 out of 7 and that of KDE is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.