EPA vs KDE Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPA (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KDE (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dengeli Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EPA | KDE | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.21% | 0.41% |
| 1 month | 3.15% | 0.28% | 0.20% |
| 3 months | 9.89% | 7.93% | 8.83% |
| 6 months | 21.38% | 22.41% | 16.56% |
| YTD | 31.76% | 42.28% | 27.81% |
| 1 year | — | 52.84% | 39.52% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EPA vs KDE comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EPA (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KDE (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dengeli Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EPA leads in 4 and KDE leads in 5. EPA is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KDE is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KDE leads (0.28% vs 0.28%). 1 week: EPA leads (0.67% vs 0.21%). 1 month: EPA leads (3.15% vs 0.28%). 3 months: EPA leads (9.89% vs 7.93%). 6 months: KDE leads (22.41% vs 21.38%). YTD: KDE leads (42.28% vs 31.76%). Size (TRY): KDE leads (637.5M vs 637.2M). Investors: KDE leads (3,744 vs 138). Risk: EPA leads (1 vs 3).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EPA or KDE?
Year to date EPA returned 31.76% and KDE returned 42.28%; over the last year EPA returned — and KDE returned 52.84%. Over the last month EPA returned 3.15% and KDE returned 0.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EPA or KDE?
As of September 28, 2026, EPA has a size of TRY 637.2M with 138 investors, while KDE has a size of TRY 637.5M with 3,744 investors. KDE leads in size and KDE leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EPA and KDE mean?
The CMB risk score of EPA is 1 out of 7 and that of KDE is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.