Yatırımcı.AI

KDE vs KTM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KDE (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dengeli Katılım Fonu) and KTM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Birinci Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

KDEKTM
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KDE vs KTM Fund Comparison
MetricKDEKTMCategory median
Daily0.28%0.53%0.29%
1 week0.21%−0.36%0.41%
1 month0.28%−2.66%0.20%
3 months7.93%4.40%8.83%
6 months22.41%17.35%16.56%
YTD42.28%29.62%27.81%
1 year52.84%39.03%39.52%
3 years—186.50%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KDE vs KTM comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KDE (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dengeli Katılım Fonu) and KTM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Birinci Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KDE leads in 6 and KTM leads in 3. KDE is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KTM is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KTM leads (0.53% vs 0.28%). 1 week: KDE leads (0.21% vs −0.36%). 1 month: KDE leads (0.28% vs −2.66%). 3 months: KDE leads (7.93% vs 4.40%). 6 months: KDE leads (22.41% vs 17.35%). YTD: KDE leads (42.28% vs 29.62%). 1 year: KDE leads (52.84% vs 39.03%). Size (TRY): KTM leads (659M vs 637.5M). Investors: KTM leads (5,760 vs 3,744).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KDE returned 42.28% and KTM returned 29.62%; over the last year KDE returned 52.84% and KTM returned 39.03%. Over the last month KDE returned 0.28% and KTM returned −2.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KDE has a size of TRY 637.5M with 3,744 investors, while KTM has a size of TRY 659M with 5,760 investors. KTM leads in size and KTM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KDE is 3 out of 7 and that of KTM is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.