EPA vs KTM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPA (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KTM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Birinci Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EPA | KTM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | −0.36% | 0.41% |
| 1 month | 3.15% | −2.66% | 0.20% |
| 3 months | 9.89% | 4.40% | 8.83% |
| 6 months | 21.38% | 17.35% | 16.56% |
| YTD | 31.76% | 29.62% | 27.81% |
| 1 year | — | 39.03% | 39.52% |
| 3 years | — | 186.50% | 172.10% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EPA vs KTM comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EPA (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KTM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Birinci Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EPA leads in 6 and KTM leads in 3. EPA is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KTM is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KTM leads (0.53% vs 0.28%). 1 week: EPA leads (0.67% vs −0.36%). 1 month: EPA leads (3.15% vs −2.66%). 3 months: EPA leads (9.89% vs 4.40%). 6 months: EPA leads (21.38% vs 17.35%). YTD: EPA leads (31.76% vs 29.62%). Size (TRY): KTM leads (659M vs 637.2M). Investors: KTM leads (5,760 vs 138). Risk: EPA leads (1 vs 3).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EPA or KTM?
Year to date EPA returned 31.76% and KTM returned 29.62%; over the last year EPA returned — and KTM returned 39.03%. Over the last month EPA returned 3.15% and KTM returned −2.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EPA or KTM?
As of September 28, 2026, EPA has a size of TRY 637.2M with 138 investors, while KTM has a size of TRY 659M with 5,760 investors. KTM leads in size and KTM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EPA and KTM mean?
The CMB risk score of EPA is 1 out of 7 and that of KTM is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.