Yatırımcı.AI

BVZ vs FZP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) side by side.

BVZFZP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVZ vs FZP Fund Comparison
MetricBVZFZPCategory median
Daily0.12%−0.09%0.06%
1 week0.68%0.77%0.56%
1 month3.27%1.39%1.84%
3 months9.50%5.59%3.29%
6 months20.83%12.49%7.90%
YTD39.77%29.06%17.53%
1 year46.61%36.07%21.48%
3 years284.53%227.98%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVZ vs FZP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVZ leads in 9 and FZP leads in 2. BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BVZ leads (0.12% vs −0.09%). 1 week: FZP leads (0.77% vs 0.68%). 1 month: BVZ leads (3.27% vs 1.39%). 3 months: BVZ leads (9.50% vs 5.59%). 6 months: BVZ leads (20.83% vs 12.49%). YTD: BVZ leads (39.77% vs 29.06%). 1 year: BVZ leads (46.61% vs 36.07%). 3 years: BVZ leads (284.53% vs 227.98%). Size (TRY): BVZ leads (726M vs 714.5M). Investors: FZP leads (442 vs 366). Risk: BVZ leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVZ returned 39.77% and FZP returned 29.06%; over the last year BVZ returned 46.61% and FZP returned 36.07%. Over the last month BVZ returned 3.27% and FZP returned 1.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, BVZ has a size of TRY 726M with 366 investors, while FZP has a size of TRY 714.5M with 442 investors. BVZ leads in size and FZP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVZ is 2 out of 7 and that of FZP is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.