FZP vs RPN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FZP | RPN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.12% | −1.93% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | −0.11% | −3.91% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 0.91% | −6.30% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 5.36% | −14.89% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 13.24% | −9.43% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 27.05% | 4.10% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 36.91% | 13.30% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 230.53% | 33.04% | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FZP vs RPN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FZP leads in 11 and RPN leads in 0. FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FZP leads (−0.12% vs −1.93%). 1 week: FZP leads (−0.11% vs −3.91%). 1 month: FZP leads (0.91% vs −6.30%). 3 months: FZP leads (5.36% vs −14.89%). 6 months: FZP leads (13.24% vs −9.43%). YTD: FZP leads (27.05% vs 4.10%). 1 year: FZP leads (36.91% vs 13.30%). 3 years: FZP leads (230.53% vs 33.04%). Size (TRY): FZP leads (745.6M vs 740.1M). Investors: FZP leads (465 vs 23). Risk: FZP leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FZP or RPN?
Year to date FZP returned 27.05% and RPN returned 4.10%; over the last year FZP returned 36.91% and RPN returned 13.30%. Over the last month FZP returned 0.91% and RPN returned −6.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FZP or RPN?
As of October 22, 2026, FZP has a size of TRY 745.6M with 465 investors, while RPN has a size of TRY 740.1M with 23 investors. FZP leads in size and FZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FZP and RPN mean?
The CMB risk score of FZP is 3 out of 7 and that of RPN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.