Yatırımcı.AI

BVZ vs NMU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and NMU (Nurol Portföy Mutlak Getiri Hedefli Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

BVZNMU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVZ vs NMU Fund Comparison
MetricBVZNMUCategory median
Today (est.)—1.31%1.08%
Daily0.12%−0.00%0.06%
1 week0.68%0.65%0.56%
1 month3.27%2.82%1.84%
3 months9.50%8.96%3.29%
6 months20.83%21.24%7.90%
YTD39.77%35.07%17.53%
1 year46.61%—21.48%
3 years284.53%—105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 12, 2026, 12:24.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVZ vs NMU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and NMU (Nurol Portföy Mutlak Getiri Hedefli Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, BVZ leads in 7 and NMU leads in 1. BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NMU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BVZ leads (0.12% vs 0.00%). 1 week: BVZ leads (0.68% vs 0.65%). 1 month: BVZ leads (3.27% vs 2.82%). 3 months: BVZ leads (9.50% vs 8.96%). 6 months: NMU leads (21.24% vs 20.83%). YTD: BVZ leads (39.77% vs 35.07%). Size (TRY): BVZ leads (726M vs 720.2M). Investors: BVZ leads (366 vs 222).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVZ returned 39.77% and NMU returned 35.07%; over the last year BVZ returned 46.61% and NMU returned —. Over the last month BVZ returned 3.27% and NMU returned 2.82%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, BVZ has a size of TRY 726M with 366 investors, while NMU has a size of TRY 720.2M with 222 investors. BVZ leads in size and BVZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVZ is 2 out of 7 and that of NMU is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.