Yatırımcı.AI

BIP vs BVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) side by side.

BIPBVZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BIP vs BVZ Fund Comparison
MetricBIPBVZCategory median
Daily−0.35%0.09%0.05%
1 week0.28%0.70%0.44%
1 month2.19%2.83%0.38%
3 months9.22%9.50%3.95%
6 months20.60%20.98%8.45%
YTD35.62%36.70%16.06%
1 year45.98%46.71%20.98%
3 years—286.42%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BIP vs BVZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BIP leads in 1 and BVZ leads in 8. BIP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BVZ leads (0.09% vs −0.35%). 1 week: BVZ leads (0.70% vs 0.28%). 1 month: BVZ leads (2.83% vs 2.19%). 3 months: BVZ leads (9.50% vs 9.22%). 6 months: BVZ leads (20.98% vs 20.60%). YTD: BVZ leads (36.70% vs 35.62%). 1 year: BVZ leads (46.71% vs 45.98%). Size (TRY): BIP leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: BVZ leads (388 vs 151).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BIP returned 35.62% and BVZ returned 36.70%; over the last year BIP returned 45.98% and BVZ returned 46.71%. Over the last month BIP returned 2.19% and BVZ returned 2.83%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BIP has a size of TRY 1.2B with 151 investors, while BVZ has a size of TRY 1.2B with 388 investors. BIP leads in size and BVZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BIP is 2 out of 7 and that of BVZ is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.