Yatırımcı.AI

BPO vs MHM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHM (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

BPOMHM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BPO vs MHM Fund Comparison
MetricBPOMHMCategory median
Daily−2.18%−0.10%−1.35%
1 week−7.51%0.30%−2.09%
1 month−10.73%2.05%−4.70%
3 months−13.45%8.87%−1.44%
6 months−10.64%19.27%2.69%
YTD15.67%34.58%20.04%
1 year23.39%45.86%28.83%
3 years141.61%250.87%156.52%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BPO vs MHM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHM (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BPO leads in 1 and MHM leads in 10. BPO is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MHM leads (−0.10% vs −2.18%). 1 week: MHM leads (0.30% vs −7.51%). 1 month: MHM leads (2.05% vs −10.73%). 3 months: MHM leads (8.87% vs −13.45%). 6 months: MHM leads (19.27% vs −10.64%). YTD: MHM leads (34.58% vs 15.67%). 1 year: MHM leads (45.86% vs 23.39%). 3 years: MHM leads (250.87% vs 141.61%). Size (TRY): MHM leads (87.5M vs 79.6M). Investors: BPO leads (930 vs 684). Risk: MHM leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BPO returned 15.67% and MHM returned 34.58%; over the last year BPO returned 23.39% and MHM returned 45.86%. Over the last month BPO returned −10.73% and MHM returned 2.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, BPO has a size of TRY 79.6M with 930 investors, while MHM has a size of TRY 87.5M with 684 investors. MHM leads in size and BPO leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BPO is 5 out of 7 and that of MHM is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.