Yatırımcı.AI

BPO vs GPT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GPT (Aktif Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

BPOGPT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BPO vs GPT Fund Comparison
MetricBPOGPTCategory median
Daily−2.89%−1.51%−0.83%
1 week−1.96%0.62%−0.98%
1 month−6.06%−1.67%−1.82%
3 months−5.31%0.73%3.78%
6 months5.38%35.12%14.04%
YTD25.65%39.39%24.40%
1 year31.97%48.11%34.17%
3 years148.78%32.17%157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BPO vs GPT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GPT (Aktif Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BPO leads in 2 and GPT leads in 8. BPO is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; GPT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPT leads (−1.51% vs −2.89%). 1 week: GPT leads (0.62% vs −1.96%). 1 month: GPT leads (−1.67% vs −6.06%). 3 months: GPT leads (0.73% vs −5.31%). 6 months: GPT leads (35.12% vs 5.38%). YTD: GPT leads (39.39% vs 25.65%). 1 year: GPT leads (48.11% vs 31.97%). 3 years: BPO leads (148.78% vs 32.17%). Size (TRY): BPO leads (89M vs 88.1M). Investors: GPT leads (2,737 vs 933).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BPO returned 25.65% and GPT returned 39.39%; over the last year BPO returned 31.97% and GPT returned 48.11%. Over the last month BPO returned −6.06% and GPT returned −1.67%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, BPO has a size of TRY 89M with 933 investors, while GPT has a size of TRY 88.1M with 2,737 investors. BPO leads in size and GPT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BPO is 5 out of 7 and that of GPT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.