Yatırımcı.AI

FIM vs MHM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIM (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHM (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

FIMMHM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FIM vs MHM Fund Comparison
MetricFIMMHMCategory median
Daily−0.11%0.01%−0.41%
1 week−0.19%0.49%−1.69%
1 month0.98%2.25%−3.34%
3 months6.67%9.11%0.00%
6 months11.89%19.39%4.10%
YTD26.56%34.72%21.58%
1 year34.78%46.24%30.90%
3 years185.67%251.23%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FIM vs MHM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIM (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHM (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIM leads in 2 and MHM leads in 9. FIM is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MHM leads (0.01% vs −0.11%). 1 week: MHM leads (0.49% vs −0.19%). 1 month: MHM leads (2.25% vs 0.98%). 3 months: MHM leads (9.11% vs 6.67%). 6 months: MHM leads (19.39% vs 11.89%). YTD: MHM leads (34.72% vs 26.56%). 1 year: MHM leads (46.24% vs 34.78%). 3 years: MHM leads (251.23% vs 185.67%). Size (TRY): FIM leads (89.7M vs 87.5M). Investors: FIM leads (2,733 vs 682). Risk: MHM leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FIM returned 26.56% and MHM returned 34.72%; over the last year FIM returned 34.78% and MHM returned 46.24%. Over the last month FIM returned 0.98% and MHM returned 2.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FIM has a size of TRY 89.7M with 2,733 investors, while MHM has a size of TRY 87.5M with 682 investors. FIM leads in size and FIM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIM is 4 out of 7 and that of MHM is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.