BCK vs MHM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BCK (Deniz Portföy Blockchain ve Fintech Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and MHM (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BCK | MHM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.56% | 0.01% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −2.78% | 0.49% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −7.52% | 2.25% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −2.36% | 9.11% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 9.50% | 19.39% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 27.53% | 34.72% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 23.37% | 46.24% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | — | 251.23% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BCK vs MHM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BCK (Deniz Portföy Blockchain ve Fintech Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and MHM (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BCK leads in 3 and MHM leads in 7. BCK is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BCK leads (0.56% vs 0.01%). 1 week: MHM leads (0.49% vs −2.78%). 1 month: MHM leads (2.25% vs −7.52%). 3 months: MHM leads (9.11% vs −2.36%). 6 months: MHM leads (19.39% vs 9.50%). YTD: MHM leads (34.72% vs 27.53%). 1 year: MHM leads (46.24% vs 23.37%). Size (TRY): BCK leads (91.1M vs 87.5M). Investors: BCK leads (2,170 vs 682). Risk: MHM leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BCK or MHM?
Year to date BCK returned 27.53% and MHM returned 34.72%; over the last year BCK returned 23.37% and MHM returned 46.24%. Over the last month BCK returned −7.52% and MHM returned 2.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BCK or MHM?
As of October 22, 2026, BCK has a size of TRY 91.1M with 2,170 investors, while MHM has a size of TRY 87.5M with 682 investors. BCK leads in size and BCK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BCK and MHM mean?
The CMB risk score of BCK is 6 out of 7 and that of MHM is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.