Yatırımcı.AI

BPO vs FIU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FIU (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

BPOFIU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BPO vs FIU Fund Comparison
MetricBPOFIUCategory median
Daily−2.05%−1.43%−0.41%
1 week−5.17%−3.63%−1.69%
1 month−7.75%−4.90%−3.34%
3 months−10.81%−4.50%0.00%
6 months−8.65%5.43%4.10%
YTD18.24%29.07%21.58%
1 year27.00%34.65%30.90%
3 years146.99%158.00%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BPO vs FIU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FIU (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BPO leads in 1 and FIU leads in 9. BPO is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; FIU is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FIU leads (−1.43% vs −2.05%). 1 week: FIU leads (−3.63% vs −5.17%). 1 month: FIU leads (−4.90% vs −7.75%). 3 months: FIU leads (−4.50% vs −10.81%). 6 months: FIU leads (5.43% vs −8.65%). YTD: FIU leads (29.07% vs 18.24%). 1 year: FIU leads (34.65% vs 27.00%). 3 years: FIU leads (158.00% vs 146.99%). Size (TRY): BPO leads (81.7M vs 79.8M). Investors: FIU leads (1,021 vs 931).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BPO returned 18.24% and FIU returned 29.07%; over the last year BPO returned 27.00% and FIU returned 34.65%. Over the last month BPO returned −7.75% and FIU returned −4.90%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BPO has a size of TRY 81.7M with 931 investors, while FIU has a size of TRY 79.8M with 1,021 investors. BPO leads in size and FIU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BPO is 5 out of 7 and that of FIU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.