BPO vs GVA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GVA (Garanti Portföy Elektrikli ve Otonom Araçlar Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BPO | GVA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.05% | −0.15% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −5.17% | −2.62% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −7.75% | −6.05% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −10.81% | −7.73% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | −8.65% | −6.73% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 18.24% | 9.03% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 27.00% | 16.88% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 146.99% | 115.61% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BPO vs GVA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GVA (Garanti Portföy Elektrikli ve Otonom Araçlar Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BPO leads in 5 and GVA leads in 6. BPO is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; GVA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GVA leads (−0.15% vs −2.05%). 1 week: GVA leads (−2.62% vs −5.17%). 1 month: GVA leads (−6.05% vs −7.75%). 3 months: GVA leads (−7.73% vs −10.81%). 6 months: GVA leads (−6.73% vs −8.65%). YTD: BPO leads (18.24% vs 9.03%). 1 year: BPO leads (27.00% vs 16.88%). 3 years: BPO leads (146.99% vs 115.61%). Size (TRY): BPO leads (81.7M vs 80.1M). Investors: GVA leads (3,143 vs 931). Risk: BPO leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BPO or GVA?
Year to date BPO returned 18.24% and GVA returned 9.03%; over the last year BPO returned 27.00% and GVA returned 16.88%. Over the last month BPO returned −7.75% and GVA returned −6.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BPO or GVA?
As of October 22, 2026, BPO has a size of TRY 81.7M with 931 investors, while GVA has a size of TRY 80.1M with 3,143 investors. BPO leads in size and GVA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BPO and GVA mean?
The CMB risk score of BPO is 5 out of 7 and that of GVA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.