Yatırımcı.AI

BGL vs GRA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GRA (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

BGLGRA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BGL vs GRA Fund Comparison
MetricBGLGRACategory median
Daily−0.77%−0.87%−0.87%
1 week−0.92%−1.06%−1.08%
1 month−2.98%−3.77%−3.64%
3 months3.77%3.67%3.88%
6 months−6.52%−7.06%−6.41%
YTD−1.34%2.38%4.04%
1 year3.60%6.77%9.03%
3 years235.31%236.84%244.17%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BGL vs GRA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GRA (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BGL leads in 7 and GRA leads in 3. BGL is a Gold Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; GRA is a Gold Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BGL leads (−0.77% vs −0.87%). 1 week: BGL leads (−0.92% vs −1.06%). 1 month: BGL leads (−2.98% vs −3.77%). 3 months: BGL leads (3.77% vs 3.67%). 6 months: BGL leads (−6.52% vs −7.06%). YTD: GRA leads (2.38% vs −1.34%). 1 year: GRA leads (6.77% vs 3.60%). 3 years: GRA leads (236.84% vs 235.31%). Size (TRY): BGL leads (66.3B vs 10.2B). Investors: BGL leads (770,405 vs 77,328).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BGL returned −1.34% and GRA returned 2.38%; over the last year BGL returned 3.60% and GRA returned 6.77%. Over the last month BGL returned −2.98% and GRA returned −3.77%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, BGL has a size of TRY 66.3B with 770,405 investors, while GRA has a size of TRY 10.2B with 77,328 investors. BGL leads in size and BGL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BGL is 6 out of 7 and that of GRA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.