Yatırımcı.AI

DBA vs GRA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DBA (Deniz Portföy Altın Fonu) and GRA (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

DBAGRA
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DBA vs GRA Fund Comparison
MetricDBAGRACategory median
Daily0.45%0.48%0.49%
1 week−1.70%−1.56%−1.65%
1 month−5.12%−5.37%−5.35%
3 months10.49%9.75%10.41%
6 months2.79%0.85%2.13%
YTD10.19%5.79%8.20%
1 year30.16%26.29%27.66%
3 years281.10%277.62%287.47%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DBA vs GRA comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DBA (Deniz Portföy Altın Fonu) and GRA (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DBA leads in 6 and GRA leads in 4. DBA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; GRA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GRA leads (0.48% vs 0.45%). 1 week: GRA leads (−1.56% vs −1.70%). 1 month: DBA leads (−5.12% vs −5.37%). 3 months: DBA leads (10.49% vs 9.75%). 6 months: DBA leads (2.79% vs 0.85%). YTD: DBA leads (10.19% vs 5.79%). 1 year: DBA leads (30.16% vs 26.29%). 3 years: DBA leads (281.10% vs 277.62%). Size (TRY): GRA leads (10.6B vs 9.5B). Investors: GRA leads (77,854 vs 24,619).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DBA returned 10.19% and GRA returned 5.79%; over the last year DBA returned 30.16% and GRA returned 26.29%. Over the last month DBA returned −5.12% and GRA returned −5.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DBA has a size of TRY 9.5B with 24,619 investors, while GRA has a size of TRY 10.6B with 77,854 investors. GRA leads in size and GRA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DBA is 6 out of 7 and that of GRA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.