Yatırımcı.AI

GRA vs TUA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRA (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TUA (Teb Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.

GRATUA
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GRA vs TUA Fund Comparison
MetricGRATUACategory median
Daily0.48%0.36%0.49%
1 week−1.56%−1.78%−1.65%
1 month−5.37%−5.50%−5.35%
3 months9.75%10.59%10.41%
6 months0.85%1.86%2.13%
YTD5.79%7.89%8.20%
1 year26.29%27.50%27.66%
3 years277.62%291.12%287.47%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GRA vs TUA comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GRA (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TUA (Teb Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRA leads in 4 and TUA leads in 6. GRA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; TUA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GRA leads (0.48% vs 0.36%). 1 week: GRA leads (−1.56% vs −1.78%). 1 month: GRA leads (−5.37% vs −5.50%). 3 months: TUA leads (10.59% vs 9.75%). 6 months: TUA leads (1.86% vs 0.85%). YTD: TUA leads (7.89% vs 5.79%). 1 year: TUA leads (27.50% vs 26.29%). 3 years: TUA leads (291.12% vs 277.62%). Size (TRY): TUA leads (14.6B vs 10.6B). Investors: GRA leads (77,854 vs 30,086).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GRA returned 5.79% and TUA returned 7.89%; over the last year GRA returned 26.29% and TUA returned 27.50%. Over the last month GRA returned −5.37% and TUA returned −5.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GRA has a size of TRY 10.6B with 77,854 investors, while TUA has a size of TRY 14.6B with 30,086 investors. TUA leads in size and GRA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GRA is 6 out of 7 and that of TUA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.