Yatırımcı.AI

BGL vs OJK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and OJK (Qnb Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.

BGLOJK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BGL vs OJK Fund Comparison
MetricBGLOJKCategory median
Daily0.49%0.46%0.48%
1 week−1.42%−1.69%−1.62%
1 month−5.37%−5.09%−5.37%
3 months9.19%10.93%10.27%
6 months0.18%4.39%2.08%
YTD0.75%10.86%8.02%
1 year23.42%32.06%27.56%
3 years278.41%306.52%287.47%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BGL vs OJK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and OJK (Qnb Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BGL leads in 4 and OJK leads in 6. BGL is a Gold Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; OJK is a Gold Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BGL leads (0.49% vs 0.46%). 1 week: BGL leads (−1.42% vs −1.69%). 1 month: OJK leads (−5.09% vs −5.37%). 3 months: OJK leads (10.93% vs 9.19%). 6 months: OJK leads (4.39% vs 0.18%). YTD: OJK leads (10.86% vs 0.75%). 1 year: OJK leads (32.06% vs 23.42%). 3 years: OJK leads (306.52% vs 278.41%). Size (TRY): BGL leads (68.6B vs 45.8B). Investors: BGL leads (772,144 vs 26,908).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BGL returned 0.75% and OJK returned 10.86%; over the last year BGL returned 23.42% and OJK returned 32.06%. Over the last month BGL returned −5.37% and OJK returned −5.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BGL has a size of TRY 68.6B with 772,144 investors, while OJK has a size of TRY 45.8B with 26,908 investors. BGL leads in size and BGL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BGL is 6 out of 7 and that of OJK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.