BGL vs TTA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TTA (İş Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BGL | TTA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.68% | −0.59% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | 0.79% | 0.60% | 0.74% |
| 1 month | −0.69% | −0.98% | −1.26% |
| 3 months | −2.35% | −2.62% | −2.52% |
| 6 months | −4.46% | −4.73% | −4.66% |
| YTD | −0.59% | −1.35% | 4.61% |
| 1 year | 6.55% | 5.21% | 11.50% |
| 3 years | 243.81% | 213.85% | 245.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BGL vs TTA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TTA (İş Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BGL leads in 9 and TTA leads in 1. BGL is a Gold Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; TTA is a Gold Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: TTA leads (−0.59% vs −0.68%). 1 week: BGL leads (0.79% vs 0.60%). 1 month: BGL leads (−0.69% vs −0.98%). 3 months: BGL leads (−2.35% vs −2.62%). 6 months: BGL leads (−4.46% vs −4.73%). YTD: BGL leads (−0.59% vs −1.35%). 1 year: BGL leads (6.55% vs 5.21%). 3 years: BGL leads (243.81% vs 213.85%). Size (TRY): BGL leads (66.4B vs 24.1B). Investors: BGL leads (769,230 vs 224,103).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BGL or TTA?
Year to date BGL returned −0.59% and TTA returned −1.35%; over the last year BGL returned 6.55% and TTA returned 5.21%. Over the last month BGL returned −0.69% and TTA returned −0.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BGL or TTA?
As of November 12, 2026, BGL has a size of TRY 66.4B with 769,230 investors, while TTA has a size of TRY 24.1B with 224,103 investors. BGL leads in size and BGL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BGL and TTA mean?
The CMB risk score of BGL is 6 out of 7 and that of TTA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.