Yatırımcı.AI

EAE vs GRA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EAE (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GRA (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

EAEGRA
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

EAE vs GRA Fund Comparison
MetricEAEGRACategory median
Daily0.54%0.48%0.49%
1 week−1.73%−1.56%−1.65%
1 month−5.18%−5.37%−5.35%
3 months10.76%9.75%10.41%
6 months2.68%0.85%2.13%
YTD11.52%5.79%8.20%
1 year26.44%26.29%27.66%
3 years—277.62%287.47%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the EAE vs GRA comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EAE (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GRA (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EAE leads in 7 and GRA leads in 2. EAE is a Gold Fund fund managed by —; GRA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EAE leads (0.54% vs 0.48%). 1 week: GRA leads (−1.56% vs −1.73%). 1 month: EAE leads (−5.18% vs −5.37%). 3 months: EAE leads (10.76% vs 9.75%). 6 months: EAE leads (2.68% vs 0.85%). YTD: EAE leads (11.52% vs 5.79%). 1 year: EAE leads (26.44% vs 26.29%). Size (TRY): GRA leads (10.6B vs 7.7B). Investors: EAE leads (101,198 vs 77,854).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date EAE returned 11.52% and GRA returned 5.79%; over the last year EAE returned 26.44% and GRA returned 26.29%. Over the last month EAE returned −5.18% and GRA returned −5.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, EAE has a size of TRY 7.7B with 101,198 investors, while GRA has a size of TRY 10.6B with 77,854 investors. GRA leads in size and EAE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EAE is 6 out of 7 and that of GRA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.