BDA vs ZPA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BDA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BDA | ZPA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.08% | 0.24% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −0.48% | 0.47% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −0.35% | 2.19% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 5.84% | 6.40% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 10.70% | 13.43% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 12.52% | 16.98% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | — | 23.05% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | — | 115.12% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BDA vs ZPA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BDA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, BDA leads in 0 and ZPA leads in 8. BDA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZPA leads (0.24% vs 0.08%). 1 week: ZPA leads (0.47% vs −0.48%). 1 month: ZPA leads (2.19% vs −0.35%). 3 months: ZPA leads (6.40% vs 5.84%). 6 months: ZPA leads (13.43% vs 10.70%). YTD: ZPA leads (16.98% vs 12.52%). Size (TRY): ZPA leads (4.5B vs 4.3B). Investors: ZPA leads (967 vs 768).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BDA or ZPA?
Year to date BDA returned 12.52% and ZPA returned 16.98%; over the last year BDA returned — and ZPA returned 23.05%. Over the last month BDA returned −0.35% and ZPA returned 2.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BDA or ZPA?
As of September 29, 2026, BDA has a size of TRY 4.3B with 768 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 4.5B with 967 investors. ZPA leads in size and ZPA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BDA and ZPA mean?
The CMB risk score of BDA is — out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.