BDA vs DVS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BDA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BDA | DVS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.08% | 0.10% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −0.48% | 0.69% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −0.35% | 3.17% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 5.84% | 10.04% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 10.70% | 21.00% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 12.52% | 32.13% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | — | 45.80% | 21.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BDA vs DVS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BDA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, BDA leads in 2 and DVS leads in 6. BDA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; DVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DVS leads (0.10% vs 0.08%). 1 week: DVS leads (0.69% vs −0.48%). 1 month: DVS leads (3.17% vs −0.35%). 3 months: DVS leads (10.04% vs 5.84%). 6 months: DVS leads (21.00% vs 10.70%). YTD: DVS leads (32.13% vs 12.52%). Size (TRY): BDA leads (4.3B vs 4.1B). Investors: BDA leads (768 vs 354).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BDA or DVS?
Year to date BDA returned 12.52% and DVS returned 32.13%; over the last year BDA returned — and DVS returned 45.80%. Over the last month BDA returned −0.35% and DVS returned 3.17%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BDA or DVS?
As of September 29, 2026, BDA has a size of TRY 4.3B with 768 investors, while DVS has a size of TRY 4.1B with 354 investors. BDA leads in size and BDA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BDA and DVS mean?
The CMB risk score of BDA is — out of 7 and that of DVS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.