Yatırımcı.AI

SPE vs ZPA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SPE (Azimut Portföy 5.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

SPEZPA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

SPE vs ZPA Fund Comparison
MetricSPEZPACategory median
Daily−0.12%0.24%−0.07%
1 week−0.39%0.47%−0.29%
1 month0.28%2.19%0.00%
3 months4.95%6.40%4.33%
6 months15.05%13.43%11.90%
YTD18.65%16.98%14.97%
1 year26.91%23.05%21.27%
3 years154.62%115.12%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the SPE vs ZPA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of SPE (Azimut Portföy 5.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, SPE leads in 5 and ZPA leads in 5. SPE is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZPA leads (0.24% vs −0.12%). 1 week: ZPA leads (0.47% vs −0.39%). 1 month: ZPA leads (2.19% vs 0.28%). 3 months: ZPA leads (6.40% vs 4.95%). 6 months: SPE leads (15.05% vs 13.43%). YTD: SPE leads (18.65% vs 16.98%). 1 year: SPE leads (26.91% vs 23.05%). 3 years: SPE leads (154.62% vs 115.12%). Size (TRY): ZPA leads (4.5B vs 4.3B). Investors: SPE leads (1,021 vs 967).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date SPE returned 18.65% and ZPA returned 16.98%; over the last year SPE returned 26.91% and ZPA returned 23.05%. Over the last month SPE returned 0.28% and ZPA returned 2.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, SPE has a size of TRY 4.3B with 1,021 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 4.5B with 967 investors. ZPA leads in size and SPE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of SPE is — out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.